Thursday, 12 April 2012

BISHOP JOHN BAPTIST KAGGWA'S EASTER MESSAGE

Bishop John Baptist Kaggwa
8th April 2012

Bishop John Baptist Kaggwa of Masaka Catholic diocese used his Easter sermon to send a bold message to President Museveni: drop the guns, the teargas and seriously consider dialogue with your opponents. 

 In a no-holds-barred Easter homily at Kitovu cathedral that lasted about 45 minutes, Bishop Kaggwa warned that Uganda may be plunged into chaos if leaders at various levels do not stop acting with...
out reason. He said recent events in the country are a testimony that some leaders have “empty heads”, a development the bishop described as Uganda’s biggest challenge.

 “The actions we see today are because some of our leaders are not learned. This part (pointing at his forehead) is empty,” Bishop Kaggwa said.
He cited last month’s clashes in Kampala between the Police and opposition politicians, one of which left a police officer, John Michael Ariong, dead and several people battered and rounded up by the police.

 “The violence that led to the police officer’s death and the manner in which the Police handled the situation all point to the fact that some of our heads are empty,” Bishop Kaggwa added.

 “We saw the Police rounding up people indiscriminately. Some were severely tortured and had to be flown out of the country for specialised treatment. Others had flimsy charges preferred against them. Doesn’t this show that some of us act without reason?”
The prelate then turned his guns on junior officers of the security agencies, whom he castigated for obeying all orders without question or reason.
“Even if it’s an order [from your superior], before you obey, you should ask yourself whether it is reasonable to open fire or tear gas at a crowd,” the bishop said.

 Using a Luganda adage and in reference to the recent banning of the Activists for Change (A4C) pressure group, the bishop said the use of force to stifle divergent political views would only compound the problem.  “Instead of making statements banning certain political groups, the government should find means of holding talks with the opposition. The correct line for this country is dialogue, not any other means,” he said.

 He added that the ban on A4C and the now common Police violence against journalists were in violation of the constitution. “We’ve seen journalists being attacked and beaten by security personnel, and their gadgets confiscated and at times destroyed. Sometimes, it’s the media houses that are attacked. This is a direct abuse of the provisions in our constitution on freedom of speech and access to information,” he said.

 Bishop Kaggwa urged leaders to begin thinking about ways of putting Uganda back on track as the country approaches her 50th independence anniversary.  “Looking at what is happening in our country, I feel it is better for us to roll it back to the pre-independence times, because that’s when we had leaders that cared for the general welfare of the population,” he said.

 Turning to corruption, Kaggwa lamented that the national treasury has been depleted by a few well-connected individuals who have strangely been forgiven by the President.  “This has only encouraged others to also grab whatever they can from the treasury — and they will also be forgiven, without having to return anything to the treasury,” he said.
The judicial system, the bishop said, has been abused, with many innocent Ugandans languishing in prisons across the country without trial.  “For some people, it takes just a few months for their cases to be disposed of, but if the issue for which you were jailed relates to the Kabaka, it has to take three years for formal charges to be brought up against you,” Bishop Kaggwa said. This was in reference to the youth who have been remanded at Luzira prison since the September 2009 ‘Buganda riot’ sparked off by the government’s refusal to let Kabaka Ronald Muwenda Mutebi II visit his subjects in Kayunga district. As the bishop rapped the government, A4C national coordinator and Masaka municipality MP Matthias Mpuuga seemed to enjoy every bit of the sermon. And when he was asked to speak, the outspoken legislator started where the bishop had stopped.

 He advised the President not to tempt Ugandans into drafting prayers for his miserable demise, as was the case with Malawi’s Bingu wa Mutharika who died suddenly last week. Turning to the Bible, a charged Mpuuga cited chapter 4 in the book of Daniel, which narrates how God humbled King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon, forcing him to live in the wild like an animal for seven years. Although he welcomed the bishop’s plea for dialogue between the government and opposition, Mpuuga said religious leaders must first prevail over President Museveni to stop using force against those opposed to him

Saturday, 7 April 2012

NO RESOLUTIONS TO GROWING TENSIONS IN UGANDA - ICG

Uganda: No Resolution to Growing Tensions
Crisis Group Africa Report N°187, 5 April 2012


Museveni’s governance trajectory resembles those of Obote and Amin – without the blatant brutality – beginning with policies of tolerance and inclusion that gradually change to exclusion and repression. All three have relied on personal rule, rather than constitutional and institutional restraints, and turned increasingly to patronage and coercion to govern.

Museveni is more skilful than his predecessors and had greater political opportunity to overcome the cleavage between Buganda and the central government, but he has not found a workable solution. Nor has he been willing to tolerate any opposition that might threaten his rule. To work with either Buganda kingdom officials or political parties, he needs to accept restraints, but the prospect of large oil revenues makes this less likely, since they offer potential to sustain, even extend, his patronage system. Furthermore, Museveni has adroitly deflected Western criticism of his growing authoritarianism and of government corruption, while preserving substantial development aid and security assistance.

However, tensions are building, and patronage and repression may be insufficient to keep Uganda stable much longer.
Nairobi/Brussels, 5 April

Wednesday, 4 April 2012

KYAMBOGO STUDENTS' VIEWS ABOUT NATIONAL TRANSFORMATION


Reactions/ Comments/Observations by Kyambogo University Students

To Hon (Rtd) Okwiri Rabwoni Presentation

4th April 2012



1. If humanity is to progress, we should forget our neighborhood and recognize that humanity belongs to the human family. Therefore, if you want to change humanity, first be the change you want to see. We must define leadership in our own terms.

2. As Uganda gets to 50 years of Independence, countries like India have advanced and Uganda has completely lost track of issues. Now, for more than half of the 50 years of Independence, we are taking of one leader who does not want to leave power and the other half was characterized by violence. Should we again use violence to change leadership? President M7 in 1988 made a powerful speech at AU about Africa's problem being leaders who do not want to leave power. Now He has perfected the art of over staying in power and expanded that problem that he was talking about then in 1988. The slogan now is PAKALAST. What choice does he leave for Ugandans other than violence?

3. We need to put away the fear as young people if we are to achieve the change that Uganda needs now. We need to engage, engage and engage.

4. In Uganda, Workers MPs subscribe to a Political Party and the political party position syndrome has caught up with them to the extent of compromising their own constituency - the Trade Unions. It’s now up to us as young people to take this country forward.

5. What are the obligations of the youths in as far as wealth creation is concerned?

6. Is there a difference between terrorism and liberation?

7. There is need for the youth to operate as live wires and not insulators. We need to completely do away with fear in order to achieve economic justice and human dignity.

8. "When you see a thief kissing you, try to check whether you have all your teeth" That’s the NRM regime.

9. The young people need to do away with the stereo types and access useful information that will help as we engage critical issues.


WHY HAVE COUNTRIES LIKE MALAYSIA AND SINGAPORE DEVELOPED WHILE UGANDA IS STILL STRUGGLING WITH JIGGERS?- RABWONI AT KYAMBOGO UNIVERSITY

KYAMBOGO UNIVERSITY PUBLIC DIALOGUE
Theme: The role of the youth in National Transformation
Kyambogo Students Centre
4th April 2012

The Guest Speaker, Hon Maj Rtd Okwiri Rabwoni, while addressing Kyambogo students today stated that throughout our history, the youth have been at the centre of transformation. The pre-colonial history had Kabakas Mwanga and Kabelega fighting for their kingdoms and people; Dr. Obote, Musasizi and other young people fought for Uganda's Independence and the young people overthrew Idi Amin and Obote II regimes while fighting against dictatorship and gross abuse of human rights.

The big question that arises now is why are we still talking about transformation now???? what are the key challenges??

Today's governance is characterised by a breakdown of institutions; abuse of the trustship duty by government; Land grabbing; corruption; lack of economic justice; dehumanisation, unemployment; barefooted people and the  jiggers epidemic in the 21st century, among others.

Its important to note that if a government does not pay attention to its people, then foreigners will automatically occupy the vaccum. Classical examples to explain this scenario is the Cuba and the Libya  revolutions. Both Gaddafi and Fidel Castro claimed to be revolutionary leaders but because the Cuban government takes care of its people, USA has failed for decades to overthrow the Cuban revolution. But in Libya, because the "revolution" did not pay attention to its people, the USA swept it out in a few months.

Rabwoni possed the big question to the young people to choose either to maintain the current status in Uganda and remain as perpetual beggers or transform their country and put it on the path for political and economic revival; fit for a 21st century democratic country.

What kind of mind shift should the young people have in order to transform this nation? Why have countries like Malaysia and Singapore developed and Uganda is still struggling with Jiggers?

The time has come for the youth to take their country seriously and conquer their fear in order to take the necessary steps and deliver the much needed transformation.

FOR GOD AND MY COUNTRY.

Monday, 2 April 2012

PRESENTATION BY CHRIS NKWASIBWE- MAKERERE UNIVERSITY ON YOUTH AND TRANSFORMATION


CHRIS NKWASIBWE ON YOUTH AND TRANSFORMATION
30th March 2012
Nkozi University

Uganda stands at cross roads in its quest for good governance. The increased narrowing of political space by the state, seen in the offing of unconstitutional legislations like the public order management bill, among others.  This only affirms that while Uganda has taken four steps towards democratization of the state by strengthening the rule of law through constitutionalism, she has taken six steps back in the same direction. Uganda is now characterized as a neo-patrimonial state, and one of the most fragile in Africa.

Research has further shown that the government of Uganda has increasingly become unresponsive and insensitive to citizens concerns and amusingly citizens are taking a more passive than active role in deciding on the issues of their governance. It is even more disturbing and appalling  that the largest number of this passive citizenry are youths who form the largest numbers in all Uganda’s political and economic spaces  and represent the future of our country.
It is no longer debatable that Uganda’s demographic reality of 65% youth population means young people must be at the centre of consolidating or completely dismantling Uganda’s democratic gains towards or away from sustainable development. To assert this even deeper, Uganda 9th parliament is largely youthful, a testimony to the fact that young people are no longer tomorrow’s leaders but today’s.
While this new young breed of leaders emerges onto Uganda’s political and economic scene, the low levels of civic consciousness in this group have had a spillover effect into the country’s key governance institutions like the legislature resulting into more reactive than responsive debate for legislation, extreme polarization and intolerance for dissenting and diverging views, increasing disregard for constitutionalism resulting into governance crisis in Uganda at hand. 

The broader and most significant context of this challenge is the death of idealism and ideology in Uganda’s politics which have been replaced by individualism which is detrimental to the growth of democracy.

It is important to appreciate that despite the existence of more than 33registered political parties, many of these parties do not have a political ideology of their own. It is for this reason that political parties engage with narrow party issues as opposed to collective national issues, with greater focus on individuals as opposed to ideology born out of idealism. Instead, parties are seen to or seem to protect individual interest as opposed to being grounded in ideology and what that translates into socio economically and politically. The result of this is the Uganda we see today:  A nation that is divided along individual party lines, increased exclusion and intolerance for diversity, abuse of public office and compromised socio service delivery in the sectors of health infrastructure among others.

As Uganda passes through these trying moments it is imperative that Ugandans must strengthen and contribute greatly towards the Uganda they would love to see. It as in that regard therefore, that the historic role of youth in engendering discourses and socio-political transformation  by nurturing a  culture that promotes an interaction between societies and ideas through research, debate, innovation and refining of ideologies must be reawakened to address the evolving trends in Uganda’s governance.

It is with such a background of need, urgency, desire, concern and responsibility that a group of thirty youth from across several universities sat at garuga and engaged in contemporary socio-economic issues and reflect deeper to provide a viable solution on how to sustainably Uganda’s challenges. 

Guided by; diversity, inclusiveness youth leadership, national unity, peace and tolerance freedom and human dignity, they came up with and later adopted the document: the Garuga declaration which on behalf of the hope initiative, I present to you today.

TERM LIMITS WOULD LIFT THE DARK POLITICAL CLOUDS - MUNIINI

Muniini K. Mulera

Term limits would lift the dark political clouds


Posted  Monday, April 2  2012 at  00:00

Dear Tingasiga: I was as resolute in advocating presidential term limits during the making of Uganda’s Constitution in the early 1990s as I was opposed to the amendment that lifted them in 2005. I have not changed my mind. Indeed I am more persuaded than ever before that it is in Uganda’s national interest that presidential term limits be restored. The gentleman for whose benefit the Constitution was amended has proved to the doubters that prolonged stay in power corrupts and fossilises national government, and amplifies instability in young states.
The President’s need to entrench and defend himself amid declining popularity, widening economic disparity, escalating corruption and other scandals has propelled him to rely on militarism, State violence, bribery and manipulation as the preferred means of governance. This, in turn, has pushed many citizens to nurture thoughts of violent response and a rejection of peaceful dialogue. Street protests, for example, have become a substitute for sober debate. The State has responded with violence against unarmed citizens. A vicious cycle has been set in motion, creating a political tornado with a potentially dangerous destination.
Such fear of change or loss of power is not a monopoly of President Museveni or the NRM. The symptoms of intolerance for genuine competition and top leadership change have been manifest in the opposition parties as well, especially the UPC, DP and FDC. Men and women in the forefront of the struggle for political and leadership change in Uganda, have had trouble accepting challenge and genuinely free and fair competition within their own political parties.
One of the most fascinating dramas of 2011 was the effort by senior FDC leaders to lift term limits. FDC spokesperson Wafula Oguttu informed the nation last December that some party leaders had wanted to amend the constitution in order to enable Dr Kizza Besigye to stay on as president.
Yes, Tingasiga, the very people who had parted ways with Museveni’s NRM had brought the bad habits of the ruling party to the one that was supposed to be a vehicle for “democratic change.” “It was not easy when (Besigye) announced his decision,” Oguttu told journalists. “We had a two-hour discussion and disagreements over the decision. Many officials did not like it, but the party has to go on.” That these agents of “democratic change” had spent two hours debating the validity of term limits was a very sobering revelation. Frankly some of us wondered whether or not we were drinking from a poisoned chalice. To his credit, Dr Besigye stood firm and refused to be “persuaded” by the appeals of those who wanted to betray FDC and democracy. However, his biggest test will come when the time comes for the party to select a candidate for the 2016 national presidential elections. One hopes that he will reject any and all efforts by party members to persuade him to seek to be the FDC’s presidential candidate for 2016.
While there is nothing in the FDC constitution that prohibits Dr Besigye from seeking the party’s nod to take on Museveni in 2016, his greatest contribution to democracy in Uganda will be his voluntary decision to completely retire from his party’s leadership.
Like the great leaders of the past, such as George Washington of the USA and Nelson Mandela of South Africa, voluntarily relinquishing of power is a greater legacy than heroic acts on the political and military battlefields. Among the oft stated benefits of presidential term limits is the opportunity for leadership renewal, with its attendant new ideas and approaches to national development. It also spreads economic and social opportunities among a larger section of the population, with different political or regional groups taking their turn at the trough. This, in theory at least, reduces the envy that is often directed at a group that monopolises power.
A benefit of presidential term limits that deserves greater emphasis is the hope it gives other political players to occupy State House one day. Such hope encourages opposition groups to focus their energies on developing alternative policies and programmes, and on seeking the electorate’s approval in advance of the next elections.
Where such hope exists, there is hardly any reason for opposition politicians to take to the bush or the streets in mass protests. The Walk-to-Work protest in Uganda is the direct consequence of the closed doors to genuine democracy and freedom. The Activists for Change (A4C) would probably not have been necessary had there been an opportunity for the opposition to have a fair shot at gaining power through free and fair elections between fresh candidates, not against a deeply entrenched incumbent with no term limits. The dark clouds that threaten to engulf Uganda trace their origins to the pockets of the MPs whose votes were bought with Shs5m to lift the term limits in 2005.
Those clouds can be lifted by Parliament, propelled to action by a collective voice of citizens at home and in the Diaspora.
Dr Mulera is a consultant pediatrician and neonatologist
mkmulera@aol.com

TRIBAL CARD SHOULD NOT DENY MUNTU CRACK AT FDC MANTLE- RABWONI

Sunday, 01 April 2012 20:09
Written by David Tash Lumu
E-mail Print PDF

In for Muntu: Okwir Rwaboni finds no reason why Muntu shouldn't succeed fellow tribesman Besigye
Retired Major Okwir Rabwoni, a former Youth MP turned activist with the Centre for Constitutional Governance, has supported a bid by former Army Commander, Major General Mugisha Muntu, to replace outgoing FDC leader, Col (rtd) Dr Kizza Besigye.
Rabwoni, has also condemned the widely held political theory within FDC that Besigye’s successor should not come from the western region, arguing that tribe shouldn’t be put ahead of merit.
“I have heard people in FDC say that [they] will not elect Mugisha Muntu because he comes from western Uganda. That is backward,” Rabwoni, said.
A former FDC activist who participated in the 1981-1986 bush war that brought NRM into power, Rabwoni, was speaking on Capital FM’s popular Capital Gang political show on Saturday. His remarks come at a time when the tribal card has been played by some FDC members in the search for Besigye’s replacement. The aforesaid members opine that the person to take over the mantle should not come from where Besigye hails — western region.
Already, Muntu, who is FDC’s Secretary for Mobilisation and Nathan Nandala Mafabi, Leader of Opposition in Parliament and Budadiri West MP, have declared their intentions to replace Besigye. Owing to the fact that he hails from western Uganda, Mugisha Muntu has been written off by a section of FDC members. However, Rabwoni, has dismissed this line of thought as “petty”.
“I don’t want to do petty politics. I want to do qualitative politics,” he said.
Rabwoni,, a brother to the late Brig Noble Mayombo, argues that Uganda is faced with “mediocrity” and that the opposition is “weak” and “paranoid”. He has also called upon Museveni to revisit the critical paper that was authored by Besigye in 1999 and assess why the revolution has gone off track.
“Government no longer cares. Why don’t we re-examine the issues that Besigye raised. We had caring governments [like] that of Milton Obote, but now things are collapsing. We have to go back to the drawing board as a country and ask where we went wrong, especially us who were liberators,” Rabwoni, advised
Elsewhere, he praised the current bi-partisan cooperation among a section of lawmakers in the ninth parliament on issues affecting the citizens. He, however, rallied for a national dialogue so that Ugandans can determine their future. He also argued that the proposed talks between Museveni and Besigye cannot work.
“We need to conquer fear and talk to one another as Uganda; not Besigye talking to Museveni. We need dialogue,” he said, adding: “It is important to respect the constitution, build the institutions and have a vibrant society. Corruption must be addressed.  Why don’t we have a functional cabinet? Why is the presidency almost the only institution in the country? Ugandans should come up and question these issues. If we are to strengthen our society, we need to sober up and take our country forward”.

dtlumu@observer.ug